A "workaround" is to create a macro file of the command(s) you want, and redirect each of them to a file. Them run DSMADMC with MACRO <macrofile> and the results will be without the headers. I like to use -TAB and -ITEMCOMMIT options. like this:
Q ACT BEGINT=-01:00 > QACT.TXT and you'll get your output, tab delimited without the headers. A co-worker turned me on to this. I've used this in several Perl scripts to product activity reports. Bill Boyer "Hit any user to continue!" - ??? -----Original Message----- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jolliff, Dale Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 12:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Stop Bagging TSM Developers. I'm sure being a TSM developer isn't much fun these days - I can sympathize with them a bit from the aspect of some things being out of their control. I have been writing some scripts for TSM this morning, and I'm in a bit of a bad mood - hence the snipe at the developers. Now that I'm venting up on the soapbox as it were, I'd like to say this - I can remember a couple of times seeing it requested on this list that we be able to disable the Copyright headers that are displayed when doing commandline functions with the admin client. I would think that would be a fairly simple thing to implement. Perhaps a command line switch to eliminate the header and trailer... If we just can't be eliminated, could it at least be made a consistent length between the -tabdelimited, -commadelimited and unformatted output? On another note, I just spent a week in training for another vendor's product and friends, the grass looks lot less greener over there... OK, I'm off the soapbox. I'll shut up. In three months I'll be wishing this was the worst I had to complain about. -----Original Message----- From: Kauffman, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Stop Bagging TSM Developers. And for my 2 cents worth, I see this as a TSM management and not development problem. There seems to be no regression test suite, and no change control/revision control process. Tom Kauffman NIBCO, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Jolliff, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 9:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Stop Bagging TSM Developers. Just my opinion, but based on the bug releases of late, they are doing a pretty good bagging job on their own.
