I guess it all depends on what the organisation already has. Althought I
am not directly involved with the backup where I work, we have over 450
sites around Australia backing up via TSM to one of about 6 mainframes.
These mainframes are located at one of 2 locations in Canberra. The Tapes
are in large Tape silos which hold several thousand tapes each. There are
about 11 of these silos at both sites combined. This solution was designed
as to utilise the tape silos which was becomming less and less utilised I
believe. This has been functioning in this manner for over 3 years.
For my organisation it has cost benifits based on the use of the silos,.
It is relative automatic, and does not require human intervention for the
Tapes.
Gordon Christie
CDSM
Centrelink
Australia.
"Wholey, Joseph
(IDS DM&DS)" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:
.ML.COM> Subject: Re: TSM on Mainframe
Sent by: "ADSM:
Dist Stor
Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.EDU>
04/04/2003 06:10
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor
Manager"
Bad... total cost of ownership is too high. Too many fingers in the pie
(tape group, dasd group, TCPIP group, operations etc... When you begin to
figure out total cost of ownership, you have to add
all of these support teams into the equation, not to mention the internal
charge (funny money) for MIPS usage on the mainframe that you'll incur. TSM
will also be at the mercy of the mainframe IPL
schedule as well, which typically is on Saturday night into Sunday morning
(a window that you really want open for your large archives or db backups)
If you're on any other platform, your costs should drop significantly.
e.g. If you have a P690, you have 1 SA managing that server. You don't
need nearly the staff that you'd require for a
mainframe solution. How often does an AIX or Sun machine have to be taken
down for maintenance? (not often). And finally, a P690's I/O is comparable
to a mainframes.
If you get the budget, go with a big Unix system. Run screaming from the
mainframe solution. You'll save a lot of headaches and meetings. Just my
opinion.
Regards, Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: Spearman, Wayne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 1:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM on Mainframe
We do. It works fine for us, but we are migrating off to Unix for D.R.
reasons.
-----Original Message-----
From: LeBlanc, Patricia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 1:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM on Mainframe
Does anyone out there use TSM on a mainframe?
Good? Bad? Indifferent??
Thanks!!
pattie
This message and any included attachments are from NOVANT HEALTH INC.
and are intended only for the addressee(s). The information contained
herein may include trade secrets or privileged or otherwise confidential
information. Unauthorized review, forwarding, printing, copying,
distributing, or using such information is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you received this message in error, or have
reason to believe you are not authorized to receive it, please promptly
delete this message and notify the sender by e-mail.
Thank you.
Important: This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee and may contain
information that is confidential, commercially valuable or subject to legal or
parliamentary privilege. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that
any review, re-transmission, disclosure, use or dissemination of this communication is
strictly prohibited by several Commonwealth Acts of Parliament. If you have received
this communication in error please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies
of this transmission together with any attachments.
