Hi

my experience of the Forum was that it was very powerful in creating a
clearing space into which one could have reinvented himself. I was not
attracted to their policy whereby the enrolled has to sell their own
programs. Coaching was okay and the main teaching points were clearly
taken from EST.

I assisted on the Advanced course (did not have the money to pay for
it). I liked it but I saw partecipants taking it far too seriously and
ending up in tears, nervous breakdown etc etc.

I can say that it helped in deconstructing the person/individual, but,
the numbers of breakdowns may outnumber the number of breakthroughs.

I can only recommend it if one is  a perfectly mentally stable
individual; otherwise, one may risk to fall into another "cult" and
may become dependent on it.


Kali

On 22 Lug, 15:33, Mark Ty-Wharton <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 22 July 2010 12:24, Mahakali <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > With all due respect, it all sounds very self development (i.e. an
> > improvement of your own self) rather than an opening up to the real
> > Self i.e. to the reality of what is.
>
> > Kali
>
> Okay, thank you.
>
> My experience of Landmark Education is that it carries a message that has
> two distinct qualities, a little like The Simpsons, where humour is divided
> between children's humour (the obvious) and adult humour (the background
> message - usually political or the parody of a famous film).
>
> Landmark Education seems to have a hidden message that parodies spiritual
> teachings, either that or I am filtering that meaning into it?
>
> What you don't know that you don't know for example can be interpreted in
> two ways, a superficial one, where a person wants to develop that area and a
> more profound one where there is a realisation, a knowing (of that which was
> not previously known).
>
> Landmark Education tend not to call their courses "self development" for
> that very reason.
>
> The Invented Life seminar is by design a discovery of Self and if you are
> into advaita, well worth doing.
>
> Cheers
>
> Mark

Reply via email to