About your conclusion,Marko... Through the written you have intended to communicate a meaning,haven't you?
On Jul 28, 11:27 pm, Marko Gregoric <[email protected]> wrote: > Words again, ooh fuck! I am boring > > I found my self generating the bullshit I am going to write now and most of > all I found "the source" of talking and creating all this shit. > The source is as I said a million times is the urge of communication. I > think that's almost an instinct of men being social animals. > Did you ever notice that the world, all concepts, ideas... are in fact there > just for the pure communication between people? > I think the very existence of words comes out of that. > I need to talk with you so I have to "word" it. > Let's take the example of awareness. Where and what is awareness when there > is no need to rationalize, put in words, explain. > Here the point is not what is awareness or if it exists or not. I am not > interested in that. What I am interested is: > Why am I writing this post? > Because I need to communicate with you. > My conclusion is that the meaning of the written is not really important as > much as is the fact the we need to talk. > > ps Would there be any "Parabrahman" if gurus had not have the urge to speak > to people? > > So I think the source of the universe is that very social urge to talk about > it.
