"We all agree this self illusion is created by each of us on a daily
basis".

Do we?




On Jul 29, 6:07 am, Marcus <[email protected]> wrote:
> .
>
> Communicate
>
> Dictionary entry overview: What does communicate mean?
> • COMMUNICATE (verb)
>   The verb COMMUNICATE has 7 senses:
> 1. transmit information
> 2. transmit thoughts or feelings
> 3. transfer to another
> 4. join or connect
> 5. be in verbal contact; interchange information or ideas
> 6. administer communion; in church
> 7. receive Communion, in the Catholic church
>   Familiarity information: COMMUNICATE used as a verb is common.
>
>  Dictionary entry details
>
> “transmit thoughts or feelings;”
>
> Words are to communicate,  to share some parts of you/me/us.  Like
> sharing bread or wine.   Opppppps  that was someone else.
>
> These word games we play are useful development.  If the heart and
> mind are in agreement and eyes are open to see.    These words do
> communicate a new message.   Not any particular topic or individual.
> But underline essence of a new attitude, which gives rise to a new
> feeling.    A new feeling of unity with this universe and awareness of
> a direct connection to the whole.
>
> We all agree this self illusion is created by each of us on a daily
> basis.  But within our illusions is netting which imposes constants.
> Like we all must exist to contemplate existence.  We must eat, sleep
> shit and reproduce.   We must battle against our own nature to uncover
> own true nature.   We must understand darkness, to appreciate light.
> These are a few of the constants which bind all mankind.    Allways
> has, always will.
>
> In this sense, We are not different ………………..   These discussions can
> inspire,  if you let it.
>
> .
>
> On Jul 29, 11:24 am, Rodger <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > If I have understood your starter post,communication is a natural
> > urge.If that is correct,no excuse is needed.
> > Early on,prior to written communication,when we were out hunting
> > something to eat, certain signals were used to communicate the
> > presence/location of whatever it was we were hunting...or whatever
> > might turn and hunt us.To possibly save you from being eaten I might
> > signal you to go left rather than right.Without that excuse(as you
> > call it)you might end up as food for a saber tooth.But,I signaled
> > you...with intent/purpose...for a reason.Which could've been...if we
> > didn't bring home some bacon,I would still have to put on in the
> > pot. :)
>
> > On Jul 29, 4:58 am, [email protected] wrote:
>
> > > to communicate a meaning is an excuse to communicate
> > > You need something to throw if you have the urge to throw. I think the 
> > > searching for meaning comes from the need to communicate. If you 
> > > communicate meaningful shit it is like throwing to a bigger distance.  
> > > Sent via BlackBerry from Vodafone
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Rodger <[email protected]>
>
> > > Sender: [email protected]
> > > Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 02:53:15
> > > To: Advaita-Zen<[email protected]>
> > > Subject: Re: why we conceptualize the unconceptualizable
>
> > > About your conclusion,Marko...
>
> > > Through the written you have  intended to communicate a
> > > meaning,haven't you?
>
> > > On Jul 28, 11:27 pm, Marko Gregoric <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Words again, ooh fuck! I am boring
>
> > > > I found my self generating the bullshit I am going to write now and 
> > > > most of
> > > > all I found "the source" of talking and creating all this shit.
> > > > The source is as I said a million times is the urge of communication. I
> > > > think that's almost an instinct of men being social animals.
> > > > Did you ever notice that the world, all concepts, ideas... are in fact 
> > > > there
> > > > just for the pure communication between people?
> > > > I think the very existence of words comes out of that.
> > > > I need to talk with you so I have to "word" it.
> > > > Let's take the example of awareness. Where and what is awareness when 
> > > > there
> > > > is no need to rationalize, put in words, explain.
> > > > Here the point is not what is awareness or if it exists or not. I am not
> > > > interested in that. What I am interested is:
> > > > Why am I writing this post?
> > > > Because I need to communicate with you.
> > > > My conclusion is that the meaning of the written is not really 
> > > > important as
> > > > much as is the fact the we need to talk.
>
> > > > ps Would there be any "Parabrahman" if gurus had not have the urge to 
> > > > speak
> > > > to people?
>
> > > > So I think the source of the universe is that very social urge to talk 
> > > > about
> > > > it.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to