markogreg wrote: > The I am sense also IS, therefore that either is not you.
are you sure? what have you discovered the sense of "I AM" to be? what exactly is it? does it have a cause? if so, what?
markogreg wrote: > The I am sense also IS, therefore that either is not you.
are you sure? what have you discovered the sense of "I AM" to be? what exactly is it? does it have a cause? if so, what?