That is very interesting This might sound crass but since doing the Jason Vale juice diet I have been much clearer
I used to drink a lot of wine and was always depressed I find wheat and dairy do pretty much the same In fact cows milk makes me anxious and I produce a lot of phlegm You are saying self realised overcomes food? So if I was REALLY enlightened I could have a cheese sandwich and a glass of milk and feel light, not need to start a war or fall asleep? Sent from an iPhone On 30 Aug 2010, at 01:46, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote: > You can feel the rising of consciousness from the source. > When you have heavy food like meat, this energy arising becomes very thick > and more heavy. > When you have lighter food like fruits, the consciousness becomes more > clearer and subtle. > When you are fasting or have digested all the food, you feel the whole field > clear, still and more cool and blissful. > In any case, there is always bliss because consciousness is basically > blissful. > But there are different qualities added to it by food. > Hence the qualities of the food define the quality of the so called mind. > The most well balanced state is called Sattva or pure creative energy. > With certain foods we become desperate and violent - hence Rajasic food is > used by soldiers. > Tamasic food makes us more lazy and depressed - high oily and cheese and cold > foods in general. > Satvic food is always recommended - fruits, vegetables and all health foods > in general. > Once you reach Self realization, you are always in Satvic mode because you > are controlling the state from the source. > Sattva is pure creative energy - consciousness with 5 elements. > > > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:58 AM, godszen <[email protected]> wrote: > roomsearching wrote: > > The bliss comes and goes. Because it is an effect of food. > > it is my opinion that bliss is a quality of awareness > that is known in consciousness > > of course I could be wrong? > > > ... stillness has to be maintained for a period of time until you can > > clearly identify the source. > > yes, >
