Hi Marcus - Yes - quite so.
Mental divisions "emanate" from this undivided energy. However, the content of mentation contradicts the actuality of the energy. A key contradiction is the static nature of mental imagery, including memory content - whereas the actuality of energy is constant movement, never being in the same place even once. Reliance on static mental/ emotional imagery and response leads to belief in a continuing separate self - as if there could be a static and located being in existence with its own properties. It's true that a thorough understanding of the Tai Chi symbol reveals this. Yes, this is known since before time, after death, and beyond any beyond. Peace, Dan On Nov 5, 3:42 am, Marcus <[email protected]> wrote: > . > > “There is no difference between energy and awareness - except in > terms > of mental divisions.” > > Yes, fully and utterly agreed. Further to this observation. The > term “mental divisions” is crucial to the understanding of this > point. The apparent divisions of this momentary universal > circumstance are simply human mental divisions. In this sense they > too have the right to claim existence. In the same fashion love and > hate claim to exist as mental divisions of the human psyche. > > I am sure. If it was a-tall possible to eliminate human mental > divisions from our equations of what is real. Then we might see > (but of course we would be here to see) energy, awareness, the > mountains, the grass and stars are all motions of a singularity. A > completeness where there is no time or dimensions. A wholly single > living, breathing conscious force which twists and turns it’s energy > to make manifest it’s dance of apparent creation and destruction. > > How lucky are we, to be here to witness this dance of magical mystery > human mental divisions. > > Could that I, see this universal moment as some other then > human ??? > > But then again in dreams I am seldom human …………………….. > > Love the symbol of Tao, > That ancient symbol of divine unity and append mental division ……… > it’s all been know before. > > . > > On Nov 2, 7:57 pm, Dan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > It's not just poetry that this is, there's nothing this is not. > > > Energy is positive/negative. > > > Positive and negative are unitive in their apparent separation. > > > In other words, indivisible energy expresses as apparent distinction > > through positive/negative. > > > Thus, "sensing happens" - check out sensing - it is play of apparent > > opposites (hot/cold, pain/pleasure, close/far) ... > > > Check out the symbol for Tao - an encoding of this ancient wisdom. > > > Or check out physics and play of positive and negative throughout > > physics theories. > > > Or check out Star Wars for another version of the play of positive and > > negative. > > > - D - > > > On Nov 2, 6:18 am, Mark Ty-Wharton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Very poetic :-) > > > > A magnet has a negative and a positive pole yet it is the same magnet. > > > > It's tail attracts it's head. > > > > How can this be when it is the same energy? > > > > Power vs force perhaps? > > > > Sent from an iPhone > > > > On 1 Nov 2010, at 21:42, Dan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > There is no difference between energy and awareness - except in terms > > > > of mental divisions. > > > > > Energy appears as if perceived, as movement. > > > > > Energy is apprehended. > > > > > Awareness seems to be something still, that apprehends. > > > > > Awareness is what apprehends. > > > > > At the "point" that it is clear that awareness is energy, what is > > > > apprehended is that which apprehends. > > > > > That which moves, is the unmoving. > > > > > That which knows as totality, is the totality of what is known, that > > > > can be known. > > > > > This knowing is the very energy itself, the movement as it is to and > > > > of itself, as unmoving. > > > > > Neither stationary nor in motion. > > > > > Without past, present, or future to this *is* that is no thing ... > > > > > - D -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -
