<Love the symbol of Tao,> <That ancient symbol of divine unity and append mental division ……… it’s all been know before. >
Another example of co - indecent. I just ordered a license plate and key ring with the Tao symbol. My point being, your comment on the Tao symbol solidifies even more that we are all one. On Nov 5, 6:35 pm, Mark Ty-Wharton <[email protected]> wrote: > Kippers > > On 5 November 2010 16:55, Dan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Marcus - > > > Yes - quite so. > > > Mental divisions "emanate" from this undivided energy. > > > However, the content of mentation contradicts the actuality of the > > energy. > > > A key contradiction is the static nature of mental imagery, including > > memory content - whereas the actuality of energy is constant movement, > > never being in the same place even once. Reliance on static mental/ > > emotional imagery and response leads to belief in a continuing > > separate self - as if there could be a static and located being in > > existence with its own properties. > > > It's true that a thorough understanding of the Tai Chi symbol reveals > > this. > > > Yes, this is known since before time, after death, and beyond any > > beyond. > > > Peace, > > > Dan > > > On Nov 5, 3:42 am, Marcus <[email protected]> wrote: > >> . > > >> “There is no difference between energy and awareness - except in > >> terms > >> of mental divisions.” > > >> Yes, fully and utterly agreed. Further to this observation. The > >> term “mental divisions” is crucial to the understanding of this > >> point. The apparent divisions of this momentary universal > >> circumstance are simply human mental divisions. In this sense they > >> too have the right to claim existence. In the same fashion love and > >> hate claim to exist as mental divisions of the human psyche. > > >> I am sure. If it was a-tall possible to eliminate human mental > >> divisions from our equations of what is real. Then we might see > >> (but of course we would be here to see) energy, awareness, the > >> mountains, the grass and stars are all motions of a singularity. A > >> completeness where there is no time or dimensions. A wholly single > >> living, breathing conscious force which twists and turns it’s energy > >> to make manifest it’s dance of apparent creation and destruction. > > >> How lucky are we, to be here to witness this dance of magical mystery > >> human mental divisions. > > >> Could that I, see this universal moment as some other then > >> human ??? > > >> But then again in dreams I am seldom human …………………….. > > >> Love the symbol of Tao, > >> That ancient symbol of divine unity and append mental division ……… > >> it’s all been know before. > > >> . > > >> On Nov 2, 7:57 pm, Dan <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > It's not just poetry that this is, there's nothing this is not. > > >> > Energy is positive/negative. > > >> > Positive and negative are unitive in their apparent separation. > > >> > In other words, indivisible energy expresses as apparent distinction > >> > through positive/negative. > > >> > Thus, "sensing happens" - check out sensing - it is play of apparent > >> > opposites (hot/cold, pain/pleasure, close/far) ... > > >> > Check out the symbol for Tao - an encoding of this ancient wisdom. > > >> > Or check out physics and play of positive and negative throughout > >> > physics theories. > > >> > Or check out Star Wars for another version of the play of positive and > >> > negative. > > >> > - D - > > >> > On Nov 2, 6:18 am, Mark Ty-Wharton <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > Very poetic :-) > > >> > > A magnet has a negative and a positive pole yet it is the same magnet. > > >> > > It's tail attracts it's head. > > >> > > How can this be when it is the same energy? > > >> > > Power vs force perhaps? > > >> > > Sent from an iPhone > > >> > > On 1 Nov 2010, at 21:42, Dan <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > There is no difference between energy and awareness - except in terms > >> > > > of mental divisions. > > >> > > > Energy appears as if perceived, as movement. > > >> > > > Energy is apprehended. > > >> > > > Awareness seems to be something still, that apprehends. > > >> > > > Awareness is what apprehends. > > >> > > > At the "point" that it is clear that awareness is energy, what is > >> > > > apprehended is that which apprehends. > > >> > > > That which moves, is the unmoving. > > >> > > > That which knows as totality, is the totality of what is known, that > >> > > > can be known. > > >> > > > This knowing is the very energy itself, the movement as it is to and > >> > > > of itself, as unmoving. > > >> > > > Neither stationary nor in motion. > > >> > > > Without past, present, or future to this *is* that is no thing ... > > >> > > > - D -- Hide quoted text - > > >> > - Show quoted text - > > -- > mark ty wharton > †µ€_©0Nç∑P†_Hµß > ___________________________________________________________________________________________ > The contents of this email and the context of the message and any > attachments are intended for the recipient only. > You may not copy, or redistribute the contents of this email without > the express, written consent of the author. > > mark ty-wharton is a composer, philosophical speaker and > writerhttp://mark.ty-wharton.com > @mark_tywharton
