On 21 March 2011 19:12, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote:
> "I am" is not an "in here" phenomena looking "out there" at a frightening > universe full of dangerous things - "I am" shows up as a function of what is > in the clearing "out here" at the edges of experience both finite and > anti-finite. That is to say that a... contracted individual was never > "born into" a world, rather IT is "of" this world and comes into being in a > relationship with physical existence that cannot be separated from physical > existence itself. Paradoxically "I am" both real and unreal and the dance > between all that is me can be truly magical. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Mark - your above statements are totally nonsense. Please don't write a > book if this is what you are going to fill 200 pages of it with. > don't worry, the book examines these kind of statements it doesn't ask anyone to believe anything > Sorry to say but you are most probably in an utterly delusional state of > mind. You want fame and glory and be in the limelight. > your point being?
