*Tony Parsons obviously went mad when he realized that there was no "I am". * *Hence he says there is no I , there is nobody there is no enlightenment etc. all the time in all his talks. But he was one man who I really got great inspiration from. His words had a phenomenal effect on me. Tony Parsons is amazing! Thanks for the video. I didnt know this existed on that site. He has a few other videos on youtube if you wish to view them. *
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Mark Ty-Wharton <[email protected]>wrote: > from the same website > > > http://conscious-websites.com/blueprints_european/high/popup/parson/parson01.html > > "personal enlightenment is a myth" > > On 24 March 2011 13:28, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Watch DB Gangolli. He cries towards the end. :D >> >> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Mark Ty-Wharton <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Perfect illustration thank you >>> >>> Ma Souris >>> >>> "Who are you?" >>> >>> "I don't know" >>> >>> "I really don't know" >>> >>> On 24 March 2011 12:34, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> http://conscious-websites.com/blueprints/low/index_en.html >>>> >>>> Watch Thuli Baba, Ma Souris or DB Gangolli. I personally like them. >>>> Basically they answer the same questions in their own viewpoint. >>>> But since they are all realized people, it sounds like everyone is >>>> pointing to the same thing. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Mark Ty-Wharton >>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Have you got a link Rajesh? >>>>> >>>>> I know some liberated people who are not crazy and some crazy people >>>>> who are not liberated. I know some retired people and some who work. It's >>>>> all empty and meaningless :) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 23 March 2011 15:36, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Watch some people who have reached this state (on youtube). They are >>>>>> usually in a crazy state. They dont need anything anymore. They are so >>>>>> happy. Check some of the people on the Blueprints of awakening website. >>>>>> They >>>>>> are like totally retired from life. They are mad. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 3:33 PM, roomsearching < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Mark Ty-Wharton < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nisargadatta's ultimate message is not to reside in the "I am" but >>>>>>>> to ultimately forget everything in the end and reside in the absolute. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> By taking you to the "I am" he gets you to reach it, stabilise it >>>>>>>> without words and ultimately see it as illusory. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *you have to stabilize in the "I am" until it burns away. You dont >>>>>>> just see it as illusory. There is a shift in consciousness when you >>>>>>> stabilize in the "I am" for a long time. I had some physical >>>>>>> sensations like rapid heartbeat, kundalini-like vibration of the spine >>>>>>> etc, >>>>>>> dreams of snakes etc. The I am is made of food. So it is not just >>>>>>> seeing as unreal. You have to work on it and find its source. There is a >>>>>>> portal at the source. It lies in your heart cave (also described by >>>>>>> Ramana) >>>>>>> **. Nisargadatta also calls it as the Brahma aperture. That source >>>>>>> is the Self. Its not really a physical location but it is the resonating >>>>>>> universal consciousness which can be felt in the right side of the >>>>>>> chest. >>>>>>> Dont mistake this as mystical bullshit. There is a precise method to >>>>>>> this >>>>>>> madness. Its not just blind dismissal that "I am" is illusion. When you >>>>>>> find >>>>>>> this aperture, your "I am" will collapse like a pack of cards in a split >>>>>>> second. It is a change in your whole body and DNA structure as what I >>>>>>> read >>>>>>> about the symptoms. Pure consciousness feels like a totally pure state >>>>>>> of >>>>>>> love. It is eternal and will be with you forever once you find it. >>>>>>> * >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Then it can be seen you are the absolute. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That which is real cannot be put into words. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The stand you take on the experience and the terminology you use is >>>>>>>> why we are debating this. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ideally we agree, yet we turn discussion into argument and >>>>>>>> eventually call names, fight, start wars. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So much for ideals ;) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >> > > > -- > *mark ty wharton* > click the link and read > GURU<http://www.myebook.com/index.php?option=ebook&id=12255> > _____________________________________________________ > ______________________________________ The contents of this email and the > context of the message and any attachments are intended for the recipient > only. > You may not copy, or redistribute the contents of this email without the > express, written consent of the author. > > *mark ty-wharton is a composer, philosophical speaker and writer* > *http://mark.ty-wharton.com > @mark_tywharton <http://twitter.com/mark_tywharton>* > >
