Watch some people who have reached this state (on youtube). They are usually in a crazy state. They dont need anything anymore. They are so happy. Check some of the people on the Blueprints of awakening website. They are like totally retired from life. They are mad.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 3:33 PM, roomsearching <[email protected]>wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Mark Ty-Wharton <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Nisargadatta's ultimate message is not to reside in the "I am" but to >> ultimately forget everything in the end and reside in the absolute. >> >> By taking you to the "I am" he gets you to reach it, stabilise it without >> words and ultimately see it as illusory. >> > > *you have to stabilize in the "I am" until it burns away. You dont just > see it as illusory. There is a shift in consciousness when you stabilize > in the "I am" for a long time. I had some physical sensations like rapid > heartbeat, kundalini-like vibration of the spine etc, dreams of snakes etc. > The I am is made of food. So it is not just seeing as unreal. You have > to work on it and find its source. There is a portal at the source. It lies > in your heart cave (also described by Ramana)**. Nisargadatta also calls > it as the Brahma aperture. That source is the Self. Its not really a > physical location but it is the resonating universal consciousness which can > be felt in the right side of the chest. Dont mistake this as mystical > bullshit. There is a precise method to this madness. Its not just blind > dismissal that "I am" is illusion. When you find this aperture, your "I am" > will collapse like a pack of cards in a split second. It is a change in your > whole body and DNA structure as what I read about the symptoms. Pure > consciousness feels like a totally pure state of love. It is eternal and > will be with you forever once you find it. * > >> >> Then it can be seen you are the absolute. >> >> That which is real cannot be put into words. >> >> The stand you take on the experience and the terminology you use is why we >> are debating this. >> >> Ideally we agree, yet we turn discussion into argument and eventually call >> names, fight, start wars. >> >> So much for ideals ;) >> > >
