Yeah, I think most people are using some sort of automator, and I don't see many variations on what the gen'd code should look like, so it seems ripe for formalization - unless there would be side effects. Another option would be to have blank get/set methods automatically insert that code, kind of like 'super' is automated in constructors. I think it would still be good to have a 'holder' type keyword available though, as you often want that variable for one small extra thing..
Well I'll try it anyway - I was just worried I was missing some obvious problem. Probably there are some subtle downsides that will be clearer after using it for a while. Cheers, Robin =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentorŪ http://www.develop.com NEW! ASP.NET courses you may be interested in: 2 Days of ASP.NET, 29 Sept 2003, in Redmond http://www.develop.com/courses/2daspdotnet Guerrilla ASP.NET, 13 Oct 2003, in Boston http://www.develop.com/courses/gaspdotnet View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
