On 9/11/06, Paul Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
PLEASE DO NOT LET THIS THREAD TURN INTO A PHILOSPHICAL DEBATE OF WHETHER JAVASCRIPT IS ACCESSIBLE. THIS IS NON NEGOTIONABLE ON THIS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How about a growing body of untrimmed, unformatted quoted text?
> Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 09:39:27 +0100> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Javascript Disabled> To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM> > What about putting the NOSCRIPT block in a User Control and including> it on each page?> > On 9/11/06, Dean Cleaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > Do you have a default landing page where you could set a session> > variable depending on the result of the noscript, and just use that> > there-after?> >> > Dino> >> > -----Original Message-----> > From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Cowan> > Sent: Monday, 11 September 2006 19:53> > To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM> > Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Javascript Disabled> >> > The problem with the noscript approach means I have to place it on every> > page.> > I was looking for a more generic way of doing [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> > > Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 17:37:12 +1000> From:> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-D =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r) http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
=================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
