The result is the same and right. But the following description is misleading:
> It used to be overhead back in the old days before > jar files (circa 95-97). imports used to cause directory > lookups, which were slow. > > With jar files (that have a manifest of course), there > shouldn't be a difference. There is no relation between imports and storage of class files. Radim > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Frank D. Greco > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:09 PM > To: Radim Tlusty; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: How import affect the performance? > > > >> At 05:14 PM 6/25/2002 +0530, Panyam Krishna Murthy wrote: > >> >import java.util.* > >> >compared with: > >> >import java.util.Vector > >> >cause any added overhead? > > Frank Greco said: > >> Nope. > > At 10:39 AM 6/27/2002 +0200, Radim Tlusty wrote: > >Frank is not right. > > >So the result: There isn't and can't be any difference between import > >java.util.Vector and java.util.*. > > ??? Isn't that what I said? > > Frank G. > > _______________________________________________ > Advanced-swing mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://eos.dk/mailman/listinfo/advanced-swing > _______________________________________________ Advanced-swing mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://eos.dk/mailman/listinfo/advanced-swing
