At 03:20 PM 6/27/2002 +0200, Radim Tlusty wrote:
>But the following description is misleading:
>
>> It used to be overhead back in the old days before
>> jar files (circa 95-97). imports used to cause directory
>> lookups, which were slow.
Why is this misleading? This was true back then.
>> With jar files (that have a manifest of course), there
>> shouldn't be a difference.
>
>There is no relation between imports and storage of class files.
??? I'm not sure how your inference engine works.
Who said there was a relationship?
Frank G.
_______________________________________________
Advanced-swing mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://eos.dk/mailman/listinfo/advanced-swing
