(Apologies to Alex for replying directly to him in my first attempt.) On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Alex Libman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Marco Peereboom - > > ...and I do think the question of eternal attachment to > Berkeley is something that will need to be discussed at some point. > > I fail to see why it's important. 4. Changing what B designates doesn't affect how people think about the OS. 3. Changing what B designates doesn't affect the quality of the OS, for good or ill. 2. Berkley, as pointed out by Andre, is historically significant. And... 1. I'm sure the developers have more important things to worry about than what B in BSD should stand for. -- W. Steven Schneider <[email protected]>
