On Sat, Jun 17, 2000 at 10:09:31AM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> Ah, I see. Bummer. Yes, Perl really needs a non-Camel icon.
And this could be a good time to bring the discussion back to
advocacy!
> This might actually feed into the marketing of Perl too. Camels
> are inherently unsexy. Something that was sleeker, faster, and
> all round more foxy, might have carry-on consequences beyond just
> being something to put on business cards and web pages.
Right; I've also heard Randal say he'd like the camel to refer
specifically to the Camel Book, which seems fair enough. But it
doesn't have to be sexy - pythons aren't sexy.
What's wrong with a pearl?
Simon
--
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
-- Aldous Huxley
