At 11.16 -0500 2000.06.17, Elaine -HFB- Ashton wrote:
>Simon Cozens [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth:
>*>specifically to the Camel Book, which seems fair enough. But it
>*>doesn't have to be sexy - pythons aren't sexy.
>
>Speak for yourself ;)
>
>*>What's wrong with a pearl?
>
>It might be trademarked too since EPP uses it on the cover....but I hear
>that permission for its use is very generous.
I doubt that EPP could claim trademark, since there is plenty of
prior use of pearls in association with Perl, on books, on magazine
covers, in prose, etc.
--
Chris Nandor | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://pudge.net/
Andover.Net | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://slashcode.com/