Re: More subtle Perl-bashing from the Python front

[Nathan Torkington]

Chris Nandor wrote:
> Eh.  His generalizations about what is good for what aside, his only
> specific complaints against Perl / arguments for Python boil down to "I
> like it better, and so do other people I agree with."

That's the only valid argument one way or the other, as far as I'm concerned.

Nat