On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 06:46:35PM -0500, Chris Nandor wrote:
> At 00:37 +0100 2001.03.18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Eh. His generalizations about what is good for what aside, his only
> >> specific complaints against Perl / arguments for Python boil down to "I
> >> like it better, and so do other people I agree with."
> >
> >Actually, he gives several reasons as to why he prefers Python over Perl:
>
> You say "actually" as though you are saying something in disagreement with
> my statement.
But I think I do.
Abigail
