Michael G Schwern [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth: *> *>This seems to me more just an artifact of the fact that its a dead *>language, and our concept of the language is frozen in time. Well, it is still very much alive in the Romance languages and in the Catholic Church. In the April 2001 issue of Harper's Magazine, there is a wonderful article on the wars over change and usage in the English language. http://www.harpers.org/ "...it is indisputably easier to be dogmatic than Democratic, especially about issues that are both vexed and highly charged." Snootitude. e.
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Michael G Schwern
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Michael G Schwern
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Abigail
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Benjamin Holzman
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Michael G Schwern
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity David H. Adler
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Brent Michalski
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Michael G Schwern
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Dan Brian
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity p . carmichael
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Phil . Moore
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Piers Cawley
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Uri Guttman
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Michael G Schwern
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Nicholas Clark
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Michael G Schwern
