[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > English, by comparison shows the effects of protracted foreign > occupation of English speaking peoples by conquerors who spoke a > foreign language. And also of protacted occupation of foreign countries by English speaking conquerors. Witness the number of Indian loan words, especially in British English, and even more so in Army English. > Japan, in contrast, has no "independence day" because until 1945, > they had never been invaded and conquered. Remember, Britain hasn't been invaded or conquered since 1066. A remarkably large number of 'foreign' words have entered English since then. The rules seems to be "If it's a word for a concept we don't actually have a word for, and it's not a complete and utter bastard to pronounce/spell then nick it." -- Piers
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Brent Michalski
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Michael G Schwern
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Dan Brian
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity p . carmichael
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Phil . Moore
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Piers Cawley
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Uri Guttman
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Michael G Schwern
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Nicholas Clark
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Michael G Schwern
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Abigail
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Michael G Schwern
- RE: Perl culture, perl readabillity Frank Schmuck, CFO
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity John Porter
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Piers Cawley
