> Elaine said: > I'm not convinced that a lack of advertising money is the reason why Perl > isn't as popular as Java or MS products. I disagree. I would agree with Stas Bekman that the biggest thing that can be done for Perl advocacy is to find a big company to get behind it. Although I believe that you are right and that word-of-mouth recommendations are the best, I think that market legitimacy is the first criteria for most. That is, if the language does not seem legit, nobody will try the language in the first place and thus have no comments to be spread via word of mouth. I think most CIOs who must choose an "official" platform for their company do not even consider Perl because it does not "feel" legitimate to them. PS: Hey guys, this time, please don't chime in with, "Hey, my CIO uses Perl!!!" I am talking about averages in the market here. We all know that there are cool CIOs out there. That is not the point.
- perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Scott R. Godin
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Abigail
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Kurt D. Starsinic
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Patrick Carmichael
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Scott R. Godin
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Abigail
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- RE: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Selena Sol
- RE: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Hasanuddin Tamir
- RE: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Selena Sol
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Stas Bekman
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Ask Bjoern Hansen
- RE: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Stas Bekman
- RE: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Jason W. May
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- RE: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Jason W. May
- RE: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Stas Bekman
