>>> Elaine said: >>> I'm not convinced that a lack of advertising money is the reason why Perl >>> isn't as popular as Java or MS products. >> Selena replied: >> I disagree. I would agree with Stas Bekman that the biggest thing that can >> be done for Perl advocacy is to find a big company to get behind it. > Hasanuddin said: > If Java has Sun behind, is it in the same sense that C has (again) > Microsoft, Borland, or other compiler vendor behind? If not, what > makes it different between Perl and C in popularity while none of > them really "owns" C? I don;t think anyone needs to "own" the language. They just have to put marketing dollars behind it. In this case, yes, Borland and Microsoft would be equivalent to SUN.
- perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Scott R. Godin
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Abigail
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Kurt D. Starsinic
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Patrick Carmichael
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Scott R. Godin
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Abigail
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- RE: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Selena Sol
- RE: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Hasanuddin Tamir
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Selena Sol
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Stas Bekman
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Ask Bjoern Hansen
- RE: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Stas Bekman
- RE: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Jason W. May
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- RE: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Jason W. May
- RE: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Stas Bekman
- RE: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Selena Sol
- RE: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Stas Bekman
