>>> Elaine said:
>>> I'm not convinced that a lack of advertising money is the reason why
Perl
>>> isn't as popular as Java or MS products.

>> Selena replied:
>> I disagree.  I would agree with Stas Bekman that the biggest thing that
can
>> be done for Perl advocacy is to find a big company to get behind it.

> Hasanuddin said:
> If Java has Sun behind, is it in the same sense that C has (again)
> Microsoft, Borland, or other compiler vendor behind?  If not, what
> makes it different between Perl and C in popularity while none of
> them really "owns" C?

I don;t think anyone needs to "own" the language.  They just have to put
marketing dollars behind it.  In this case, yes, Borland and Microsoft would
be equivalent to SUN.

Reply via email to