-- "Jason W. May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I don't think Phil was suggesting that Perl 5 isn't a good option for
non-sysadmin problems.  It's entirely perception - most managers without
a sysadmin background do not perceive Perl as being an appropriate choice
for application software.

Regardless of the particulars of Perl 6, I don't see any activity
underway that is likely to change this perception.

Java has been transformed over the last several years from a language
perceived as appropriate only for client software (applets) to a language
now perceived as appropriate for server software.  This has occurred
primarily through the efforts of Sun's marketing department.  I don't see
any force acting to promote Perl as an appropriate choice for corporate
application development.

You can substitute Python for Perl in the above.  Or PHP.
A major difference w/ P6 will be that its underpinnings
are solidly OO. The syntax and some parts of the storage
model will also be a bit more amentable to OO advocates
(including Dr. Conway). Net result may be that P6 IS what
academics will accept as a "legimate" language.


--
Steven Lembark                               2930 W. Palmer
Workhorse Computing                       Chicago, IL 60647
                                           +1 773 252 1080

Reply via email to