Hi all!

This thread is getting a bit ridiculous. There are lot of ad-hominem attacks 
here, which I don't like.

If you have some factual critique about perlmeme.org, perl-begin.berlios or 
learn.perl.org, don't hesitate to voice it. It is possible all three of the 
sites could use some work, and outlining the problems is the first step for 
the cure. However, if you're going to insult someone for pointing out 
problems, you're not going to be effective.

So please stick to the facts. And if you feel like correcting one thing or 
another, please also consider sending a patch against the source of one site 
or another. Complaining is easy, but correcting the problem is more rewarding 
for both parties.

A constructive criticism to Randal and other similar participants in this 
discussion: you would be much more effective if you will be less insulting 
and flambouyant, and more pleasant, controlled, supportive, complimentary, 
and as a general rule, friendlier and less socially challenged.

No one is born with good social engineering skills - it is something you work 
on. Not only it is worth your time to develop such skills, but you'll be 
better off in any regards. Randal is a wonderful Perl hacker, tutor and 
writer. But he could be much less controversial if he controlled his temper, 
and stopped accusing people of doing the worst actions since not shipping 
bread loafs sliced.[1]

Finally, I should also note that it is my humble opinion that we should not 
attack people for starting their own Perl beginners' portals, tutorials, 
resources, forums, Wikis or whatever. There are tens if not hundreds of such 
resources for PHP, Java, Visual Basic each, and it only made them more 
popular. I don't see a point in trying to prevent duplicate effort, 
especially considering how much busy the .perl.org admins (Ask Bjorn Hansen, 
etc.) are and how much more straightforward it is to set up one's own site 
where one or his community have complete control.

Regards,

        Shlomi Fish

[1] - I should note that friendliness/social engineering and contribution to 
society are not one and the same. Some of the greatest past and present 
villains were very friendly and hospitable (re Al Capone). Some of the 
greatest value producers were antipathic (re Henry Ford). Nevertheless, 
social engineering helps you become better at contributing values to society, 
and enable you to gather more help from the outside. So it's a good idea to 
have it and it's never too late to gain it.

On Monday 03 October 2005 23:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I guess you need the money. You know, to pay those legal fees and all.
>
> Now this comment #really# contributes to the point you want to make. You
> couldn't possibly go lower than this. Bravo!
>
> GM

-- 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage:        http://www.shlomifish.org/

95% of the programmers consider 95% of the code they did not write, in the
bottom 5%.

Reply via email to