On Nov 12, 2012, at 8:37 AM, Hugh Brock wrote: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 08:09:10AM -0500, Scott Seago wrote: >> On 11/12/2012 05:45 AM, Jiří Stránský wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> *proposed members of the cabal are in CC, please ACK or NACK your >>> membership by Nov 13*. >>> >>> Technical Cabal info (mostly what Hugh wrote[1] earlier): >>> >>> * Mission for Technical Cabal: Make technical and architectural >>> decisions across the Aeolus project. Settle disputes. >>> >>> * One of the aims of the Technical Cabal is to have people from >>> various Aeolus subprojects present on the cabal, so that decisions >>> can be made effectively across all of the subprojects. On the >>> other hand, we try to keep the member count reasonably low >>> to make efficient communication possible. >>> >>> * We have four cabals: Technical, Website, Publicity, Release. >>> >>> * Cabals should have short weekly meetings. >>> >>> * Membership on the cabal should be for the period of one upstream >>> release (roughly 6 months, next two releases have a shorter cycle >>> though). Repeated membership is possible. >>> >>> * Each cabal has an Awesome, a person who should make sure that regular >>> meetings of the cabal really happen. Initial Awesomes are appointed, >>> a proper election of a permanent Awesome should take place on the >>> first meeting of each cabal. >>> >>> * Notes about meeting results should be published to aeolus-devel. >>> >>> Proposed members, as nominated at Aeolus Developer Conference: >>> >>> * Tomas Sedovic >>> * Martyn Taylor >>> * Jason Guiditta >>> * Scott Seago >> ACK >> >>> * Eric Helms >>> * Michal Fojtik >>> * Greg Blomquist >>> * Jaromir Coufal (user experience advocate) >>> >>> *Please ACK or NACK your membership by Nov 13.* Also if anyone else >>> feels that the list of cabal members should be different, speak up >>> please. >>> >>> Initial Awesome for the Technical Cabal is Hugh Brock. >>> >>> [1] >>> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/aeolus-devel/2012-November/013191.html > > BTW, in case I didn't make this clear before: all these membership lists > are proposals we came up with in the group last week. If you weren't > able to make it to the conference, this doesn't mean you're ineligible > to be in any of the Cabals -- feel free to nominate yourself or others. > > --Hugh
I'd like to nominate myself to the Technical Cabal. Joe VLcek
