On Nov 12, 2012, at 12:23 PM, Hugh Brock wrote: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:08:36PM -0500, Joseph VLcek wrote: >> >> On Nov 12, 2012, at 8:37 AM, Hugh Brock wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 08:09:10AM -0500, Scott Seago wrote: >>>> On 11/12/2012 05:45 AM, Jiří Stránský wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> *proposed members of the cabal are in CC, please ACK or NACK your >>>>> membership by Nov 13*. >>>>> >>>>> Technical Cabal info (mostly what Hugh wrote[1] earlier): >>>>> >>>>> * Mission for Technical Cabal: Make technical and architectural >>>>> decisions across the Aeolus project. Settle disputes. >>>>> >>>>> * One of the aims of the Technical Cabal is to have people from >>>>> various Aeolus subprojects present on the cabal, so that decisions >>>>> can be made effectively across all of the subprojects. On the >>>>> other hand, we try to keep the member count reasonably low >>>>> to make efficient communication possible. >>>>> >>>>> * We have four cabals: Technical, Website, Publicity, Release. >>>>> >>>>> * Cabals should have short weekly meetings. >>>>> >>>>> * Membership on the cabal should be for the period of one upstream >>>>> release (roughly 6 months, next two releases have a shorter cycle >>>>> though). Repeated membership is possible. >>>>> >>>>> * Each cabal has an Awesome, a person who should make sure that regular >>>>> meetings of the cabal really happen. Initial Awesomes are appointed, >>>>> a proper election of a permanent Awesome should take place on the >>>>> first meeting of each cabal. >>>>> >>>>> * Notes about meeting results should be published to aeolus-devel. >>>>> >>>>> Proposed members, as nominated at Aeolus Developer Conference: >>>>> >>>>> * Tomas Sedovic >>>>> * Martyn Taylor >>>>> * Jason Guiditta >>>>> * Scott Seago >>>> ACK >>>> >>>>> * Eric Helms >>>>> * Michal Fojtik >>>>> * Greg Blomquist >>>>> * Jaromir Coufal (user experience advocate) >>>>> >>>>> *Please ACK or NACK your membership by Nov 13.* Also if anyone else >>>>> feels that the list of cabal members should be different, speak up >>>>> please. >>>>> >>>>> Initial Awesome for the Technical Cabal is Hugh Brock. >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/aeolus-devel/2012-November/013191.html >>> >>> BTW, in case I didn't make this clear before: all these membership lists >>> are proposals we came up with in the group last week. If you weren't >>> able to make it to the conference, this doesn't mean you're ineligible >>> to be in any of the Cabals -- feel free to nominate yourself or others. >>> >>> --Hugh >> >> I'd like to nominate myself to the Technical Cabal. >> >> Joe VLcek > > Hello Joe. Michal has already volunteered to represent Deltacloud, so > unless you guys want to swap now I'd suggest you wait until the next > go-round which will be roughly the end of March. > > This makes me realize that I left out one important bit -- on the tech > cabal, we tried to pull one person to represent each upstream Aeolus > project, and we tried to keep the number to 7 or less. This doesn't mean > you can't listen in on meetings, it just means you can't vote unless > you're actually on the cabal. We intend the membership to be elected > anew each release. > > --Hugh
Ah OK. I hadn't understood you were trying to keep to a limited size of 7. Joe
