Apologies folks, I'm out of pocket for the next couple days and haven't had a second to organize this vote. It'll be Friday unless someone else wants to organize it sooner.
-hugh -------- Original Message -------- From: Justin Clift <[email protected]> Sent: Wed, 14/11/2012 12:19 PM To: aeolus-devel <[email protected]> CC: Subject: Mission Statement - Was Re: Aeolus Developer Conference Report. ACKS REQUIRED BY NOV 13. On 14/11/2012, at 3:00 PM, Scott Seago wrote: <snip> > Hmm. OK, I guess to me it's fairly clear that if we can handle >1, we can > handle 1 too, but I have no real objections to mentioning both, if it can be > done in such a way that everyone agrees to the wording. What is essential, > though, is that we do mention multi-instance systems, since that's a huge > part of what we do. In other words, by all means lets make it clear that we > handle "one or more instances" -- but not at the expense of not making it > equally clear that we handle complex multi-instance systems well. Hmmm, we seem to have started bike-shedding on the mission statement a while back. ;) Let's get the list of mission statement candidates written up, then vote to pick the winner. + Justin -- Aeolus Cloud Evangelist http://www.aeolusproject.org
