On 11/14/2012 12:44 PM, Hugh Brock wrote:
Apologies folks, I'm out of pocket for the next couple days and haven't had a
second to organize this vote. It'll be Friday unless someone else wants to
organize it sooner.
-hugh
-------- Original Message --------
From: Justin Clift <[email protected]>
Sent: Wed, 14/11/2012 12:19 PM
To: aeolus-devel <[email protected]>
CC:
Subject: Mission Statement - Was Re: Aeolus Developer Conference Report. ACKS
REQUIRED BY NOV 13.
On 14/11/2012, at 3:00 PM, Scott Seago wrote:
<snip>
Hmm. OK, I guess to me it's fairly clear that if we can handle >1, we can handle 1 too,
but I have no real objections to mentioning both, if it can be done in such a way that
everyone agrees to the wording. What is essential, though, is that we do mention
multi-instance systems, since that's a huge part of what we do. In other words, by all means
lets make it clear that we handle "one or more instances" -- but not at the
expense of not making it equally clear that we handle complex multi-instance systems well.
Hmmm, we seem to have started bike-shedding on the mission
statement a while back. ;)
Let's get the list of mission statement candidates written
up, then vote to pick the winner.
+ Justin
Yeah, this discussion is repeating what we hashed out last week.
Unfortunately, mmorsi wasn't there last week, so he wasn't there for the
original hashing-out -- hence this point coming up again.
That said, I'm fine voting on the results of last week, but Hugh did say
earlier in the week that on-list suggestions/tweaks were fair game for
this discussion.
Scott
