On Mar 19, 2008, at 10:17 PM, Frances Kelly wrote:
It seems in my experience that doing art is easy, but knowing art is hard; while doing science is hard, yet knowing science is easy.
What is your experience in "doing art," knowing it, doing science, and knowing it?
But why do you divide things this way? Isn't science (i.e., a discipline of knowledge) empirical? Isn't science that which one knows by doing? And similarly, art: Doesn't the artist know by doing?
Or are you just talking about the form of knowing that one attains by approaching a subject from outside it, disengaged from it, as a referee knows the game but does not play it?
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Michael Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED]
