Brian writes: > [Classically beautiful people are often] not found sexy. > But that formulation just misses the distinction in the observation, that > attractiveness is just not a function of beauty. What appeals to us > sexually in others is not degrees of outward beauty. > But Brian, reread my posting. That was exactly my point. And the parallel I was trying to draw with "works of art" is that our "interest", their compelling power, often has nothing to do with what we're inclined to call "beauty".
************** Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used car listings at AOL Autos. (http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp00300000002851)
