RE: 'they all said it [da V code] was literature, and I don't do literature'
Can't believe anyone thought it was literature. Except in the sense of words on a page. I didn't read it either but I know it wasn't literature. (Now there's an opening for Chris!) DA On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 9:48 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe there is something in it. What if art is a way of Nature to download > beauty to compact form as useful, good energy. > Boris Shoshensky > > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated 5/7/08 7:28:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > On May 7, 2008, at 7:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > Is it possible that art is a way of archiving? > > > > Oh, you watched the DaVinci Code, too. > > > > > > Did not. Didn't read it either. Too big, no pictures, and they all said it > was literature, and I don't do literature. I just meant perhaps art was a > way > of saving things so they didn't get destroyed. It would explain why some > primitive art gets saved by people not part of the culture, and why you > can't > predict whether something is going to produce an aesthetic experience in > someone-no archive. > Kate Sullivan > > > ************** > Wondering what's for Dinner Tonight? Get new > twists on family favorites at AOL Food. > > (http://food.aol.com/dinner-tonight?NCID=aolfod00030000000001) > _____________________________________________________________ > Free information on the best online trading options. Click here! > > http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2221/fc/Ioyw6i4tFWr4pLqoZQEAWTMERe3gAU > qTMsqWrlkZf8Jlk7flglzdWk/?count=1234567890<http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2221/fc/Ioyw6i4tFWr4pLqoZQEAWTMERe3gAUqTMsqWrlkZf8Jlk7flglzdWk/?count=1234567890> > > -- Derek Allan http://www.home.netspeed.com.au/derek.allan/default.htm
