In a message dated 7/25/08 8:20:23 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Clintion's testimony concerning Monica Lewinsky
> (sp?)
>
!
. He has said that his concern is ontological. An ontology is-the formal
representations within a domain and the relationships within the domain. I
would
suggest that cheerskep is insisting on defining the individuals of the domain
before the domain itself has been tentatively defined. He might claim he is
doing this because many of the individuals have different meanings to different
people and he wants to make sure which one is meant-he is in some other
larger domain using the same individuals,hovering over a vast blurry
field,unable to believe that his companions might only require common sense to
be
understood.. This requirement of defining meaning is functioning as an
evasion
of establishing the domain-evading the question in fact,in a fuzzy cloud of
only wanting to establish clear terms for our own sake.
Kate Sullivan
**************
Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign
up for FanHouse Fantasy Football today.
(http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020)
