Is that nude female or male or transgender?

WC


--- On Tue, 9/23/08, ARMANDO BAEZA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: ARMANDO BAEZA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Examining the theory
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Tuesday, September 23, 2008, 4:46 PM
> Cheerskep,
> 
> As I start a new sculpture design , which in my case 
> simply the nude figure. Most every  thing you state 
> that runs thru your mind, perhaps runs  subconscious 
> through mine, also, but unaware while in the process 
> of it's creation. I rely and trust on my training and 
> experience within my inner being to do that for me.  
> Knowing that the nude can express endless universal
> emotions ,ideas, symbolisms is part of my objective.
>  
> mando
> 
> --- On Tue, 9/23/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: Examining the theory
> > To: [email protected]
> > Date: Tuesday, September 23, 2008, 11:27 AM
> > In a message dated 9/23/08 12:35:39 PM,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > 
> > 
> > > I understand that the artist is concerned only
> > > with his/her perception - whether an observer
> shared
> > in some specific
> > > meaning is apparently not important;
> > > 
> > Geoff -- You have to keep in mind that this forum is
> > dominated by visual 
> > artists, among whom you're likely to find many --
> > though not all -- who honestly 
> > feel, "The hell with being preoccupied with the
> effect
> > of my work on others. I 
> > paint what I want."
> > 
> > I know I can be a pain in the neck for many
> fellow-listers,
> > but, say I, I am 
> > from the forum point of view healthily different. In
> two
> > ways: For one, I seem 
> > to be at the moment the only contributing
> > "philosopher". For another, I'm an 
> > "artist" of sorts, but my "art" is
> > different from visual art.
> > 
> > I'm a playwright.   Behind every line I write
> there is
> > a good deal of concern 
> > about its effects on contemplators (both readers and
> live
> > audience members). 
> > The concerns are various. Often the concern is focused
> on
> > immediate 
> > impression: If I write a line that's supposed to
> be
> > moving or funny or surprising, and 
> > in every developmental reading or workshop performance
> it
> > proves to be a dud, 
> > chances are I'll either revise it (or its
> preparatory
> > lead-up) or delete it. 
> > 
> > Accepting what I think is the spirit behind your use
> of the
> > word 'meaning', 
> > I'll make an ad-hoc distinction between two kinds
> of
> > "meaning-notion" I want to 
> > occasion. One I'll call cerebral --
> > "exposition" -- the other, emotional. In 
> > exposition, the narrative writer wants the viewer to
> take
> > on board certain 
> > "facts" about characters and their situation
> --
> > e.g. this woman is that man's 
> > daughter, this guy is very rich, that fellow has a
> terminal
> > illness. In those 
> > cases I know the "fact" I want to convey
> > "clearly".
> > 
> > But much of the "emotional" impact, the
> > idiosyncratic interpretation a viewer 
> > brings to bear, I'm happy to leave to the viewer.
> I
> > LIKE it when I see 
> > audience members leaving the theater arguing about
> given
> > characters or events. I can 
> > imagine Shakespeare's being content to see viewers
> > holding different 
> > judgments about the sanity or pitiability of Hamlet or
> > Lear. Granted, if I created a 
> > character that I liked and found intensely
> interesting, and
> > every single viewer 
> > felt he was boring and a bastard, I'd take that as
> damn
> > bad news.   
> > 
> > In practice, though, except in the farce I wrote, I
> know my
> > characters are 
> > multiplex, and I understand it when some viewers like
> them
> > some of the time and 
> > are repelled some of the time. I don't expect
> uniform
> > reactions in an audience 
> > to characters like those.   In one of my current
> scripts,
> > there's an 
> > ultra-smart, highly educated guy. I'm aware some
> > viewers will recoil from him on that 
> > fact alone. Well, I don't write for those people.
> I
> > don't want to spend two 
> > hours watching slackers in someone else's play,
> and I
> > sure don't want to spend 
> > months writing about one. So in that sense I
> "paint
> > what I want". But behind 
> > that decision is a conviction there are potential
> viewers
> > who also like being 
> > with gifted characters. 
> > 
> > As a writer, I work at creating a gripping storyline.
> And
> > I'm looking to grip 
> > not just myself but an audience. 
> > 
> > All of which is to say that "whether an observer
> > shared in some specific
> > meaning is apparently not important" doesn't
> apply
> > to this would-be "artist". 
> > 
> > 
> >    
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > **************
> > Looking for simple solutions to your real-life
> financial 
> > challenges?  Check out WalletPop for the latest news
> and
> > information, tips and 
> > calculators.
> >      
> (http://www.walletpop.com/?NCID=emlcntuswall00000001)

Reply via email to