In a message dated 11/30/08 5:06:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> In a message dated 11/30/08 5:02:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Cheerskep wrote: > > > a physicalist might claim that this is exactly what he believes -- > > > i.e. > > > that feelings, ideas, mental images etc are solely neural flesh. > > > > >And I wrote: > > But the neural flesh produces them and then goes on to do something > else.Is > > it the same neural flesh,have the feelings etc been put somewhere else > by > > the > > neural flesh, and is that somewhere also neural flesh? This whole thing is > > beginning to sound silly. > > KAte Sullivan > > > > In truth, Kate, I can't follow your question here. > Neural flesh? Are you sure you mean neural flesh? It sounds silly. If you believe-or someone believes-that thinking cannot be distinguished from the physical stuff that produces it,what do you think the physical stuff does when it goes on to think about something else? What does it do with the thought it just had? > > > > ************** Life should be easier. So should your homepage. Try the NEW AOL.com. (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity& ncid=emlcntaolcom00000002)
