On Dec 3, 2008, at 11:54 AM, Chris Miller wrote:
I am surprised that no one here has anything to say about this
dispute which
involves at least 5 academics who have published books that relate
to it.
...
This is why I find Randian aesthetics more interesting -- because at
least
they will stand up for what they think has the greatest value --
rather than
passively letting it be defined by the marketplace in cooperation
with the art
museum.
Well, why don't you stand up in your own upright Rand-y way and make
your point, instead of just yelling from the bleachers that no one
else is commenting?
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Michael Brady
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
