The inevitable is:
That any deviation from the essence of anything, as each individual
perceives it
or creates it, has some form of an aesthetic experience, whether we
like it or not,
assuming that an aesthetic experience is "something new to you or
others".
mando
On Mar 1, 2009, at 7:55 AM, Michael Brady wrote:
On Mar 1, 2009, at 10:50 AM, [email protected] wrote:
It would have one calling every reappearance of George W. Bush an
aesthetic experience.
Oh, now you use "a.e." the same as you'd use "swooning
rapturously," eh? Oops, sorry. I was thinking of the press and Obama.
Did you see the recent pic of him going into a Wal Mart and
saying, "I'm looking for a job"? Didn't feel in any way
"aesthetic" to me.
You're back to equivocating the use of "aesthetic": to you, it
seems to me, it's just a synonym for another feeling word, such as
"irritated" or "scornful" or, well, even "rapturous."
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Michael Brady
[email protected]
