Grrr. I just did it: replied to the old subject line. Here, try this.
On Mar 26, 2009, at 11:53 AM, [email protected] wrote:
2. Equipmental character consists in its usefulness. Thus, we must
consider the shoes as they are used, not in some abstract or formal
sense. [33]
3. The equipmental being of equipment is reliability. [34]
Are the numbers in brackets page references? I haven't picked up a
copy yet. IF they are, which edition are you using? Or if not, what
are they?
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Michael Brady
[email protected]
