If that is so, It seems to me that finding the universals would be
more fruitful if we
looked for them in 'man' rather than in a particular human or
myself. Guessing again.
As an artist, that is interesting to me, because I want to only
express universals.
mando
On Mar 27, 2009, at 7:26 AM, Luc Delannoy wrote:
I believe it is the phenomenological essence - eidos. Looking for
it, is part of the phenomenological inquiry. You look for the
essence of experience in order to look for universals but also for
the different essences in order to understand differences in
experiences. The experience of the Other helps understand yours.
Heidegger was not much in favor of the reductio as proposed by
Husserl, he was looking for essence, context and interpretation,
introduced existential phenomenology (modified by Sartre, Merleau-
Ponty and Marcel) and hermeneutical phenomenology (extended by
Gadamer and Ricoeur)
Do not have the English translation of the book; if I remembered
well the shoes are the ones from a painting by Van Gogh...
Luc
www.lucdelannoy.com
----- Original Message ----
From: armando baeza <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: armando baeza <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:29:11 PM
Subject: Re: Heidegger, "Origin of the WoA"
In reference to this word, I think the essence of a tree,
would be different from the essence of particular tree.
just a guess
mando
On Mar 26, 2009, at 6:13 PM, [email protected] wrote:
is that isness the same as dasein? Someone named JeanMarie
Schaeffer seems
to connect this concept with Malevitch and Blavatsky and the
sacralization of
art. There was also something about "attentional aesthetics".
Kate Sullivan
**************
Feeling the pinch at the grocery store? Make
dinner for $10 or less.
(http://food.aol.com/frugal-feasts?ncid=emlcntusfood00000001)
