"maybe because you don't seem to understand what is phenomenology nor the hermeneutics twist heidegger gave it.... he is not the only one, see gadamer, ricoeur for example. (Luc)
Guilty as charged, but I do understand the important role that Heidegger gave to "preservers" (p. 67): "Just as a work cannot be without being created but is essentially in need of creators, so what is created cannot itself come into being without those who preserve it." ....so if you're interested in art existing, one should at least try to be a "preserver" "preserving the work, as knowing, is a sober standing within the extraordinary awesomeness of the truth that is happening in the work" "He who truly knows what is, knows what he wills to do in the midst of what is" -- and "it grounds being for and with another as the historical standing out of human existence in reference to unconcealedness." So if one wants to stand "within the extraordinary awesomeness of the truth" -- and one wants to be historically grounded -- then one should be a preserver of art. But where is the evidence that Heidegger himself ever took that mission seriously enough to attempt to "preserve" the art of his own time? ____________________________________________________________ Prices, software, charts & analysis. Click here to open your online FX trading account. http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/BLSrjnxUY6xvhQMFTjdeTCSntP9yvu 3dlYACamXdpD0IM4j1hmAe2wKC0RC/
