QUE VIVAN LOS "PRESERVERS" !
mando
On Apr 17, 2009, at 6:47 AM, Chris Miller wrote:
"maybe because you don't seem to understand what is phenomenology
nor the
hermeneutics twist heidegger gave it.... he is not the only one,
see gadamer,
ricoeur for example. (Luc)
Guilty as charged, but I do understand the important role that
Heidegger gave
to "preservers" (p. 67):
"Just as a work cannot be without being created but is essentially
in need of
creators, so what is created cannot itself come into being without
those who
preserve it."
....so if you're interested in art existing, one should at least
try to be a
"preserver"
"preserving the work, as knowing, is a sober standing within the
extraordinary
awesomeness of the truth that is happening in the work"
"He who truly knows what is, knows what he wills to do in the midst
of what
is" -- and "it grounds being for and with another as the
historical standing
out of human existence in reference to unconcealedness."
So if one wants to stand "within the extraordinary awesomeness of
the truth"
-- and one wants to be historically grounded -- then one should be
a preserver
of art.
But where is the evidence that Heidegger himself ever took that
mission
seriously enough to attempt to "preserve" the art of his own time?
____________________________________________________________
Prices, software, charts & analysis. Click here to open your
online FX
trading account.
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/
BLSrjnxUY6xvhQMFTjdeTCSntP9yvu
3dlYACamXdpD0IM4j1hmAe2wKC0RC/
