I mentioned because I was asked to find it!? Boris Shoshensky ---------- Original Message ---------- From: Luc Delannoy <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Heidegger and thingness Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:26:32 -0700 (PDT)
why would you even mention finding the best in its absolute objective form? here we go again with the pre-existing singular entity... luc ----- Original Message ---- From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 7:29:54 PM Subject: Re: Heidegger and thingness Exactly. It is impossible for human mind to find the best in its absolute objective form. Too many simultaneous relativist parameters come to the play. Existentially the best (morality is out)) is what happening Now or selected by laws of being. Boris Shoshensky ---------- Original Message ---------- From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Heidegger and thingness Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:09:27 EDT In a message dated 4/23/09 7:17:09 PM, [email protected] writes: > The first part of your question is an unnatural state. > If we want compare taste of all ripe apples we have to eat all of them. > Boris Shoshensky > we will be sick and the last one will never be as good as the first. Kate Sullivan ************** ____________________________________________________________ Keep clean no matter where you are with a portable shower. Click here! http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2241/fc/BLSrjpYUV4N668aNZ2qAEuouz7aN48 vUYIziO6YidT0IeuLIO3P0HOjmlKA/
