Frances to Armando... 
It seems that there is a suggestion emerging here in this topical
debate that the material and technical and mechanical and
structural and instrumental aspects of a found habitant or a
built domicile is irrelevant to such a utility being
architecture, and possibly even being artistic. This approach may
be so, but for many theorists it may also be too vague and too
broad for a useful theory of architecture. 

You wrote... 
To some extreme religious folk, the manger would qualify. 

Reply via email to