In a message dated 2/28/09 10:47:48 AM, [email protected] writes:
> And besides that, I said "it's possible *to speak of* > good and bad qualities," which are one's judgments of the kind of > quality, but the quality resides in the object. > > It's a convenience of speech to call them "good and bad qualities," > just like it's convenience to say that the work *is* X or Y, when one > has plainly laid out the caveats of instantiation, reification, > copulating verbs, etc. > Some tools are good tools. Some tools are better made and they can be used to make better work. It's not a convenience of speech to describe your tools,it's a necessity. KAte Sullivan ************** Get a jump start on your taxes. Find a tax professional in your neighborhood today. (http://yellowpages.aol.com/search?query=Tax+Return+Preparation+%26+Filing&am p;ncid=emlcntusyelp00000004)
