>From Frances... 

Some guesses on admirable beauty and intellectual aesthetic
experiences if of interest to listers. 

-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----

 

Free Lists: Mailing List Manager <[email protected]> 

Lit Ideas Digest: Volume 06 Issue 133

Date: Tuesday 12 May 2009    

In This Issue: Science as Aesthetics? 

          

-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----

 

From: Eric Yost <[email protected]>

To: Julie and List 

 

I have been, in this thread, trying to work out what sort of
"objective" beauty is referred to, or whose perspective of beauty
must be satisfied. We were discussing separation of church and
state versus separation of science and state. Donal reacted to an
Eagleton quote by valorizing the predictive value of science.
Science, after all, is something we have been conditioned to
regard as "objective." I raised the case of Dr. Edward Witten, of
the Center for Advanced Research in Princeton, winner of the 1990
Fields Medal in Mathematics. Witten is one of the major figures
in superstring theory and has often praised the theory for its
elegance and beauty.

 

1. He believes superstring theory is too beautiful to be wrong. 

2. Yet superstring theory is untestable. It would require a
superconducting supercollider 1,000 light-years across to
validate even its basic assumptions. 

3. Therefore, for Witten, the criteria of the theory's truth is
its beauty. It cannot be tested. 

4. I asked the List, "Doesn't this make superstring physics a
branch of aesthetics?" 

5. Furthermore, I have to take Witten's word for the theory's
beauty. I do not understand the mathematics of deep symmetries in
tangled 18-dimensional topological knots. Therefore, for me, this
branch of physics is not only aesthetics, but also
aesthetics-by-authority: again, I have to take Witten's word for
its beauty. 

 

My point is that Eagleton is right. Science and religion have
different intentions and are different modalities; comparing them
is like "comparing ballet to running for a bus." 

 

End 

-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----

Reply via email to