Nature,by nature, does not differentiate between beauty or
ugly,people do.
mando
On Jun 20, 2009, at 5:59 AM, Chris Miller wrote:
"Beauty is a property of things perceived by humans, who can judge and
evaluate abstractly. And since beauty is considered to be a
culmination or
perfection of specific qualities or characteristics, there is also
ugly, the
deficiency of those qualities. But these qualities are socially
valued.
Remember: there are no ugly things "in Nature." (taken from
Michael's new
blog)
Not by me (is beauty considered to be a culmination or perfection
of specific
qualities or characteristics) -- because I can't identify them so
that I
might say "this one has a little of it, and that one has a little
more, while
that one must be ugly because it doesn't have any"
Can anyone else here identify any such specific qualities or
characteristics?
____________________________________________________________
Online Stock Trading - Straightforward pricing. Powerful tools.
Click here!
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/
BLSrjnxQzToFLQWEuvQKwpAmRmFra1
M4g8SRvzblPgE1Dzgkl3PFphNQPok/
