On Jun 26, 2009, at 7:40 AM, [email protected] wrote:

Is mark the essence of a style of each artist?

No, a mark is a mark.


A mark is a distinctive visual artifact.

Style - from stylus, a writing instrument, a thing that makes a mark.
Mark - a touching of a surface, a line made as an indication or record of something

The marks left on the surface--of a painting or of a sculpture, even-- embody and preserve the action of the maker's hand, that is, his *sytle*. No two people make identical marks, or make marks with identical physical characteristics. Forgeries or handwriting or of paintings are produced by mimicking the marks of the original, or the characteristic qualities of the original (as in the Van Meergen fabrications of Vermeer paintings). Analyzing the characteristics of a painter's marks--brushstrokes--is a basic skill and tool of art historians who seek to attribute a work to an artist. And a lot of art history and appreciation is a history and appreciation of style, both the personal and unique style of each artist and the commonalities of many artists, grouped together under the rubric of one style name or other.

A mark is more than a mark--it is, if you will, a hologram of the artist, a way of seeing the entire picture in a single element.

Moreover, emphasizing the uniqueness of an artist's mark, small or large, underlay all of the discussions back in the 60s of the action painters, who worked 'inside' the painting and whose veritable gestures as he swung his arms and distributed paint were recorded by the paint on the canvas.

Who knew that Miller's remark was all about Pollock, his bete noire?

BTW, Miller asked about whether any *writers* "used the word 'marks' and made it important to the aesthetics of painting and drawing." His question was directed to those who wrote about art, i.e., the sycophants, acolytes, factotums, and other altar boys of the great modern art swindle, not the actual swingers of paint and leavers of marks.


| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Michael Brady
[email protected]
http://considerthepreposition.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to