I actually did recognize a few of Miller's mark details but that's because I'm familiar with the same museum he went to. Monet, Harnett, Cezanne, a lot of 20 mid century, a few 21C, and 19C, plus 17C marks. wc
--- On Sun, 6/28/09, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > From: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Marks > To: [email protected] > Date: Sunday, June 28, 2009, 11:02 PM > In a message dated 6/28/09 8:52:53 > PM, [email protected] > writes: > > > > (it just seemed that marks isolated > from background would be completely > > unrecognizable. Doesn't everyone agree?) > > > No, they wouldn't be uncognizable, but they're unlikely to > make the > "artist" memorable. Even Orwell's Dickens. Otherwise the > many poets who tried > playwrighting -- and had lines therein worthy of an > anthology -- but who > couldn't > create a worthy "play" -- would be right up there with > Shakespeare, > Congreve, Sheridan, Wilde, et al. > > > > ************** > It's raining cats and dogs -- Come to PawNation, a place > where pets rule! (http://www.pawnation.com/?ncid=emlcntnew00000008)
